tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post5222163208480990287..comments2023-12-19T16:54:31.953-05:00Comments on SOUTH BRONX SCHOOL: Shame on Joy Hochstadt and Andrew OstrowksyPete Zuckerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16708676684946013529noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-12551464852355467002012-05-25T21:05:18.963-04:002012-05-25T21:05:18.963-04:00Hey my friends-fact is, this is a great post. I be...Hey my friends-fact is, this is a great post. I bet "anonymous" is really "Randy Andy". As for Joy Hochstadt, she is a con artist and she is disheveled!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-84861777521952156022012-05-24T20:01:47.957-04:002012-05-24T20:01:47.957-04:00You appear to substitute character assassination f...You appear to substitute character assassination for facts and information regarding these people and this case...generally ad hominem reason is considered a logical fallacy. If your intention was to obscure by way of ad hominem reasoning, you have certainly succeeded. That's what.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-91736885396491534882012-05-23T23:41:11.420-04:002012-05-23T23:41:11.420-04:00I chose Randy Andy because it rhymes. OK.
But Joy...I chose Randy Andy because it rhymes. OK.<br /><br />But Joy is a disheveled person, a scheister, and a con artist. So what?Pete Zuckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16708676684946013529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-22528221961658905822012-05-23T23:05:50.775-04:002012-05-23T23:05:50.775-04:00Once I got beyond the comparison of union solidari...Once I got beyond the comparison of union solidarity with Mafia loyalty, I asked myself why the author refers to Andrew Ostrowsky as Randy Andy. Is there something he/she knows that others do not? And, can one be “randy” and a “nebbish.” When the author referred to, Joy Hochstadt, as “a disheveled person, a scheister, and a con artist,” I finally figured it out.<br />The author subscribes to the NY Post style of journalism. I will take that into consideration as I ponder her comments. I wonder why she does not question how the DOE did extract such concessions from the UFT under the leadership of Randi Weingarten and Michael Mulgrew. I wonder why she/he didn’t do her ‘homework’ more carefully. The link to the actual complaint filed in Nassau County is included below. It makes very interesting reading and believe me Mr. Mulgrew’s ‘flagrante delicto’ is the least of it.http://www.parentadvocates.org/nicemedia/documents/Hochstadt_Mulgrew_EDNY.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-42926989282312205772012-05-23T17:53:03.571-04:002012-05-23T17:53:03.571-04:00Great post!!-You are right on the money-THANK YOUGreat post!!-You are right on the money-THANK YOUAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515738343772337569.post-20784213081198615192012-05-23T07:05:22.558-04:002012-05-23T07:05:22.558-04:00Good analysis. But I'd say that your last para...Good analysis. But I'd say that your last paragraph is the most important. And one way we can gain power to make the changes we know we need, is to join together and help build MORE/ The Movement of Rank and File Educators, a new caucus within the UFT. For more info, go to http://morecaucusnyc.org/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com