As many know by now, there is a new ATR agreement bestowed upon the unsuspecting, the injured, the desperate, and the pissed done in secret by the powers that be of our wonderful union, the United Federation of Teachers (Yeah, I know I am a little late to the game in sharing).
To tell you the truth, I stopped and thought about it. That's a lot of money. Figure about $15k is taken off the top and that would leave me $35k. There is this deli or something on NY 203 in Spencertown (Columbia County) NY that used to be a general store. I have a small dream of buying this place when I retire and living up there full time. I could be another Sam Drucker. Sadly, I am 53, not eligible for a full pension until 2021 and my son graduates high school in 2019. So there goes that dream, for now.
But no one is going to take the offer unless they are thisclose to retirement or thisclose to being fed up. Want to delete the ATR pool? Offer early retirement. It's been done before.
But I have some question and/or concerns about the rest of the agreement.
Some of the highlights/lowlights:
After October 15, ATRs will be given a temporary provisional assignment to a school with a vacancy in their license area where available.
So what is it we do up until October 15? But even after October 15, here is a problem.
Say they put you provisionally in school after that date. You are a common branch teacher and you have been in the ATR pool since 2012. When do you think the last time a teacher in this situation had any true professional development? When was the last time such a teacher was trained on the latest and newest curricula? When was such a teacher trained in Danielson, or had any real meaningful feedback?
Oh please, we will hear, "You are a teacher, that means you teach!" Well, I have a friend who is a doctor of proctology, I'm not going to see him about heart murmurs, am I? I mean, he is a DOCTOR? Using the DOE's logic he should be able to transfer is knowledge of colons and rectums to the heart.
But here is another problem. Instead of just plopping an ATR provisionally into any school, why not meet and/or interview the ATR and find out what their strengths are so they can be placed properly. Make it a win-win situation for all? How difficult can this be?
The DOE, at its sole discretion, may choose not to assign an ATR to a temporary provisional assignment who have been penalized (as a result of a finding of guilt or by stipulation) in conjunction with §3020-a charges based on the circumstances of each case.
OK.
The DOE shall not be required to send more than one (1) ATR at a time to a school per vacancy for a temporary provisional assignment. These assignments will first be made within district and then within borough.
This is good and bad. It's good if your district is in Western Queens or Brooklyn and you live on Long Island, or the South Bronx like I do and live in the Hudson Valley. Put me in District 10 or 11. It'll chop 20-30 minutes off my commute.
But, if it all comes down to it I would much rather stay in District 7. I know the neighborhoods, I know the schools. I know the teachers. This year I have been lucky enough to know a few teachers in each school I have been at. It makes the transition easier.
But it will affect more ATR's than it won't and this is not a fair.
It is understood that at any time after a temporary provisional assignment is made, a principal can request the removal of the ATR from this assignment and the ATR can be returned to the ATR pool and be subject to the terms and conditions of employment then applicable to ATRs pursuant to this Agreement.
This should be good. Don't like the school you are at show up wearing a dress or a pro Donald Trump shirt and boom! You go back in the pool.
What this agreement does not mention though is for those who are still being rotated, how long will the rotations be?
But there are other problems with this agreement, most of all the secrecy in which it was done and which James Eterno, Arthur Goldstein, Chaz, and Norm Scott have written about.
When ATR's received the email concerning the new ATR there is a link that takes us to a online form if we have any questions (ATR's should have some fun with this form and inundate it with REAL COMMENTS, wink, wink, nudge, nudge) for the UFT.
What is perplexing is why after the genie has packed up and left the bottle is there a way to talk to the UFT about the agreement? Why at no time did UFT leadership, re: Mulgrew and Barr take the time and play make believe and treat the ATR's as if we are retired members who live in Southeast Florida and come to us? Five borough UFT offices, five meet and greets, five question and answers, five separate days of at the very least pretending to give a shit what is on the minds of the ATR! If Mulgew was so afraid of meeting with ATR's get some tech geek to set up Survey Monkey and blast the poll out to ATR's.
I know James Eterno was working on getting ATR's recognized as a chapter and I have lost track of what the current status of that struggle is but is time to take a big step in my opinion. The fact that a few people are making the decision for about 2,000 teachers is beyond the pale and patently unethical. The ATR's should have a chapter, should have a seat(s) in the delegate assembly, and should have a seat on the executive board. The worst part is this agreement is rammed down our throats without even having a chance to vote on it!
The UFT is figuratively emasculating the ATR's by not being proactive to what we want and need. It is time that our leadership stops being reactive and try being proactive and hear what we want and need. All it will take is a little listening and a lot of empathy. How difficult can this be?
In the meantime something needs to be done. Can a complaint be filed with the National Labor Relations Board, NYS or US Department of Labor, or PERB?
Please don't tell me or any ATR that our Chapter Leaders in our schools are there for us. Many of them don't know who we are, don't care, too inexperienced, or bought. An ATR and the CL are two ships passing in the night.
Just another disgrace of the Union for not treating its experienced teachers with respect, and differently from the younger teachers. ATRs, the silent victims of closing and opening schools, the fair student act, and of abusive principals who are trying to push out experienced teachers.
ReplyDeleteOur Union has become a disgrace for our hard working teachers.
ReplyDeleteNyc DOE has become a very dishonest agency in recent years. They don't play with a full deck and do a lot of sneaky, underhanded dirty things to their employees. The DOE does not do enough to protect its members anymore. Thirty years later I have come to accept that my aunt's assessment of the teaching profession and NYC public schools was accurate. She was a teen immigrant to NY and became a high school dropout who made a living working in cash in the furnished room business. She said teaching was a job that made a person get up too damned early, put too many restrictions on one's personal life and that teachers don't make any money cause they are paid on the books and not too highly. She said why are they fingerprinting you? Did you break the law?
ReplyDeleteplease call me mr.zorro.i need to speak to you.im going to the newspapers next and show them the letters in my file.especially the one which accuses me of urinating in a bathroom and leaving my mark.
ReplyDeleteMany per diem sub teachers and paras are being disgracefully and unfairly targeted by Peter Ianiello at 65 Court St 5th Floor. He has a racket set up there that goes like this: A principal can accuse an employee of any outrageous thing without a single shred of evidence and the sub is immediately suspended and called to a conference/hearing. The accused is not given an opportunity to face the accuser or examine evidence. The accused is also barred from being represented by an attorney at this hearing despite the fact that the consequence of the outcome could be lost pay or termination. Having a union rep at the hearing is NOT the same thing as bringing a private attorney. These conferences/hearings are blatant and gauling violati
ReplyDelete