I conclude that you exercised poor judgement in responding to the situation. Specifically, you did not make an attempt to address the female student's discomfort with your proximity.
As I wrote on July 31...
Immediately the student talked to me as if I were the child. "Move away from me," "I don't want you behind me." For some dumb reason I assumed I am the teacher and the student is a student. I decided not to move due to the belief that once I walked away the student would revert to using the time for socializing instead of classwork.
However, I wonder if I was part of the favored gentry or a boxer if this would be a problem.
The letter continues...
Additionally, as an intimidation tactic, you publicly announced to call the student's mother potentially causing her embarrassment.
Intimidation tactic? Anything negative we say to a student can be called an intimidation tactic."I'm changing your PBIS card." "You can't go outside for lunch." "You are on timeout."
And it goes on...
You are reminded of your obligation to maintain an environment of rapport throughout our school community. Please be advised that this incident may lead to further disciplinary action including termination of your employment.
Blah, blah, blah.
Fuck it. The letter went to my file as an excuse to get rid of me. I get it.
According to the school wide disclipine code drawn up by the chancellor and nyc doe
ReplyDeleteBehaving in a manner which disrupts the educational process warrants a parent conference= a phone call home-is considered a conference- unless the parent would like to come in and speak to you in person?
i would bring the school wide code of conduct to your administrator
what school
ReplyDelete